Blog

Inside the SOC

Googleのマルバタイジングで配布されたVidar Info-Stealer マルウェア

Default blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog imageDefault blog image
30
Jan 2023
30
Jan 2023
このブログでは、Google検索を標的とした最近の不正広告キャンペーンを取り上げ、情報窃取型マルウェア展開の実例について紹介します。このブログでは、攻撃者の手法を取り上げ、侵害の兆候を示すリストを提供しています。また、このような攻撃の被害に遭うリスクを軽減するために、一般ユーザー向けの推奨事項も記載しています。

ここ数週間、セキュリティ研究者やサイバーセキュリティベンダーは、情報窃取マルウェアを無防備な被害者のシステムに侵入させることを目的としたGoogleの不正広告キャンペーンが増加していることを指摘しています。Notepad++、Zoom、AnyDesk、Foxit、Photoshopなどの人気ツールをGoogleで検索すると、悪意のあるサイトに誘導する広告が表示される場合があることが確認されています。本レポートでは、このようなキャンペーンの1つ、特にマルウェア Vidar Info-Stealer の配布に焦点を当て、ハイレベルな分析を提供することを目的としています。

キャンペーン内容

2023年1月25日、Darktrace の研究者は、米国内からGoogleで Notepad++ と検索すると、図1に示すような広告が表示されることを確認しました。

図1:Notepad++ で検索した際に表示されるGoogle広告

図2にあるように、この広告には出稿元に関する情報が一切表示されていません。

図2:広告情報

この広告をクリックすると、1月4日に登録され、IPアドレス 37.140.192.11 にホストされているウェブサイト notepadplusplus.site に潜在的な被害者が誘導されます。希望するソフトウェアのバージョンを選択すると、ダウンロードボタンが訪問者に表示されます。

図3:偽のNotepad++を使った悪質なサイト
図4:偽のNotepad++を使った悪質なサイト

ダウンロードをクリックすると、選択したバージョンに関わらず、https://download-notepad-plus-plus.duckdns.org/ にリダイレクトされ、npp.Installer.x64.zip という名前の .zip ファイルがダウンロードされます。

図5:トラフィックのリダイレクト

抽出した結果、ファイル npp.Installer.x64.exe のファイルサイズは 684.1 メガバイトになります。このファイルは、一部のAntivirusによるスキャンや、VirusTotalなどのマルウェア解析プラットフォームへのアップロード(ファイルサイズの上限は650メガバイト)を防ぐために、過剰な数のnullバイトを含んでいることが原因です。

図6:npp.Installer.x64.zip

当初、パディングは実行ファイルの末尾に組み込まれており、完全に機能するファイルを維持したままパディングを除去することが可能でした。しかし、今回分析したサンプルでは、パディングはバイナリの中心領域に挿入されています。この方法では、単にゼロを削除するだけでは、ファイルの整合性が損なわれ、動的解析時の機能性が損なわれるため、パディングの除去はより困難なものとなっています。

図7:null bytesのパディングの開始

図8:null bytesのパディングの終了

実行後、マルウェアは、速やかにTelegramチャンネルへの接続を確立し、コマンド&コントロール(C2)アドレス(具体的には、http://95.217.16.127)を取得します。Telegramが利用できない場合、マルウェアは、ビデオゲームプラットフォームSteam上のプロファイルへの接続を試みます。この場合、C2アドレスは、初期分析時には http://157.90.148.112/、その後 http://116.203.6.107 となります。そして、チェックインして設定ファイルを取得し、その後、様々なアプリケーションやブラウザから情報や保存されたパスワードを抽出するために利用される複数の正規DLLライブラリを含むアーカイブ、get.zipをダウンロードします。トラフィック分析、マルウェアがコマンド&コントロール(C2)ロケーションを取得する方法、および取得した設定の分析を通じて、問題のマルウェアは、Vidarとして知られる情報窃盗犯であると高い信頼性を持って評価することができます。Vidarは、様々なサイバーセキュリティ団体によって広く取り上げられています。この情報窃盗犯とその出自に関する詳細な情報は、こちら[3]をご覧ください。

図9:Telegramのトラフィック
図10:VidarのC2アドレスの所在地を含むTelegramチャンネル
図11:VidarのC2アドレスの所在地を含むSteamプロファイル
図12:Vidar C2トラフィック
図13:C2より得られたVidarの構成図
図14:Vidarでダウンロードしたライブラリ

キャンペーンID 827

マルウェアが配布されているドメイン download-notepad-plus-plus.duckdns.org は、IP アドレス 185.163.204.10 に紐付きます。パッシブDNSを使用すると、複数のドメインもこのIPアドレスに解決されることが判明しています。この情報は、このキャンペーンを担当した脅威グループが、Notepad++以外の特定のアプリケーションを検索している個人をターゲットに、広告も利用していることを示唆しています。

  • OBS Studio
  • Davinci Resolve
  • Sqlite
  • Rufus
  • Krita

さらに、今回の調査で得られたすべてのマルウェアのサンプルは、同じTelegramチャンネルに接続し、同じ2つのCommand and Control IPアドレスを利用し、同じキャンペーンIDである827を共有していることが確認されています。

結論 

近年、サイバー犯罪者がマルウェアを配布するために利用するマルバタイジングキャンペーンが急増し、大きな懸念材料となっています。Eメールなどの従来型の感染経路とは異なり、マルウェアを防御することは困難です。さらに、マルウェアのペイロードを膨らませるためにパディング技術を使用することで、検知と分析がより困難になる可能性があります。

このような攻撃を受けるリスクを軽減するために、オンライン広告を利用する際には、注意を払うことが推奨されます。具体的には、検索エンジンでフリーソフトを探す際に広告をクリックしないようにし、代わりに公式ソースから直接プログラムをダウンロードすることが推奨されます。こうすることで、信頼できないソースからマルウェアを不用意にダウンロードする可能性を低くすることができます。 

悪質な広告の脅威に対するもう一つの有効な対策は、広告ブロックソフトの活用です。広告ブロックソフトを導入することで、悪質な広告キャンペーンに対する保護が強化され、サイバーセキュリティ全体が強化されます。

付録

侵害インジケータ

ファイル名 npp .Installer.x64.zip

SHA256 ハッシュ7DFD1D4FE925F802513FEA5556DE53706D9D8172BFA207D0F8AAB3CEF46424E8

ファイル名npp.Installer.x64.exe

SHA256 Hash368008b450397c837f0b9c260093935c5cef56646e16a375ba7c47fea5562bfd

ファイル名rufus-3.21.zip

SHA256 Hash75db4f8187abf49376a6ff3de0163b2d708d72948ea4b3d5645b86a0e41af084

ファイル名rufus-3.21.exe

SHA256 Hash169603a5b5d23dc2f02dc0f88a73dcdd08a5c62d12203fb53a3f43998c04bb41

ファイル名DaVinci_Resolve_18.1.2_Windows.zip

SHA256 Hash73f00e3b3ab01f4d5de42790f9ab12474114abe10cd5104f623aef9029c15b1e

ファイル名DaVinci_Resolve_18.1.2_Windows.exe

SHA256 Hash169603a5b5d23dc2f02dc0f88a73dcdd08a5c62d12203fb53a3f43998c04bb41

ファイル名krita-x64-5.1.5-setup.zip

SHA256 Hash85eb4b0e3922312d88ca046d89909fba078943aea3b469d82655a253e0d3ac67

ファイル名krita-x64-5.1.5-setup.exe

SHA256 Hash169603a5b5d23dc2f02dc0f88a73dcdd08a5c62d12203fb53a3f43998c04bb41

URLhttp://95.217.16.127/827

URLhttp://95.217.16.127/get.zip

URLhttp://95.217.16.127/

URLhttp://157.90.148.112/827

URL http://157.90.148.112/

URLhttp://157.90.148.112/get.zip

URLhttp://116.203.6.107/

ドメインnotepadplusplus.site

ドメインdownload-notepad-plus-plus.duckdns.org

ドメインdownload-obsstudio.duckdns.org

ドメインdowbload-notepadd.duckdns.org

ドメインdowbload-notepad1.duckdns.org

ドメインdownload-davinci-resolve.duckdns.org

ドメインdownload-davinci.duckdns.org

ドメインdownload-sqlite.duckdns.org

ドメインdownload-davinci17.duckdns.org

ドメインdownload-rufus.duckdns.org

ドメインdownload-kritapaint.duckdns.org

IPアドレス 37.140.192.11

IPアドレス 185.163.204.10

IPアドレス 95.217.16.127

IPアドレス157.90.148.112

IPアドレス 116.203.6.107

URLhttps://t.me/litlebey

URL https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561199472399815

参考文献

[1] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hackers-push-malware-via-google-search-ads-for-vlc-7-zip-ccleaner/

[2] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/ransomware-access-brokers-use-google-ads-to-breach-your-network/

[3] https://www.team-cymru.com/post/darth-vidar-the-dark-side-of-evolving-threat-infrastructure

INSIDE THE SOC
Darktrace cyber analysts are world-class experts in threat intelligence, threat hunting and incident response, and provide 24/7 SOC support to thousands of Darktrace customers around the globe. Inside the SOC is exclusively authored by these experts, providing analysis of cyber incidents and threat trends, based on real-world experience in the field.
AUTHOR
ABOUT ThE AUTHOR
Roberto Martinez
Devalyst, Threat Researcher
Book a 1-1 meeting with one of our experts
この記事を共有
USE CASES
該当する項目はありません。
PRODUCT SPOTLIGHT
該当する項目はありません。
COre coverage
該当する項目はありません。

More in this series

該当する項目はありません。

Blog

Inside the SOC

Sliver C2: How Darktrace Provided a Sliver of Hope in the Face of an Emerging C2 Framework

Default blog imageDefault blog image
17
Apr 2024

Offensive Security Tools

As organizations globally seek to for ways to bolster their digital defenses and safeguard their networks against ever-changing cyber threats, security teams are increasingly adopting offensive security tools to simulate cyber-attacks and assess the security posture of their networks. These legitimate tools, however, can sometimes be exploited by real threat actors and used as genuine actor vectors.

What is Sliver C2?

Sliver C2 is a legitimate open-source command-and-control (C2) framework that was released in 2020 by the security organization Bishop Fox. Silver C2 was originally intended for security teams and penetration testers to perform security tests on their digital environments [1] [2] [5]. In recent years, however, the Sliver C2 framework has become a popular alternative to Cobalt Strike and Metasploit for many attackers and Advanced Persistence Threat (APT) groups who adopt this C2 framework for unsolicited and ill-intentioned activities.

The use of Sliver C2 has been observed in conjunction with various strains of Rust-based malware, such as KrustyLoader, to provide backdoors enabling lines of communication between attackers and their malicious C2 severs [6]. It is unsurprising, then, that it has also been leveraged to exploit zero-day vulnerabilities, including critical vulnerabilities in the Ivanti Connect Secure and Policy Secure services.

In early 2024, Darktrace observed the malicious use of Sliver C2 during an investigation into post-exploitation activity on customer networks affected by the Ivanti vulnerabilities. Fortunately for affected customers, Darktrace DETECT™ was able to recognize the suspicious network-based connectivity that emerged alongside Sliver C2 usage and promptly brought it to the attention of customer security teams for remediation.

How does Silver C2 work?

Given its open-source nature, the Sliver C2 framework is extremely easy to access and download and is designed to support multiple operating systems (OS), including MacOS, Windows, and Linux [4].

Sliver C2 generates implants (aptly referred to as ‘slivers’) that operate on a client-server architecture [1]. An implant contains malicious code used to remotely control a targeted device [5]. Once a ‘sliver’ is deployed on a compromised device, a line of communication is established between the target device and the central C2 server. These connections can then be managed over Mutual TLS (mTLS), WireGuard, HTTP(S), or DNS [1] [4]. Sliver C2 has a wide-range of features, which include dynamic code generation, compile-time obfuscation, multiplayer-mode, staged and stageless payloads, procedurally generated C2 over HTTP(S) and DNS canary blue team detection [4].

Why Do Attackers Use Sliver C2?

Amidst the multitude of reasons why malicious actors opt for Sliver C2 over its counterparts, one stands out: its relative obscurity. This lack of widespread recognition means that security teams may overlook the threat, failing to actively search for it within their networks [3] [5].

Although the presence of Sliver C2 activity could be representative of authorized and expected penetration testing behavior, it could also be indicative of a threat actor attempting to communicate with its malicious infrastructure, so it is crucial for organizations and their security teams to identify such activity at the earliest possible stage.

Darktrace’s Coverage of Sliver C2 Activity

Darktrace’s anomaly-based approach to threat detection means that it does not explicitly attempt to attribute or distinguish between specific C2 infrastructures. Despite this, Darktrace was able to connect Sliver C2 usage to phases of an ongoing attack chain related to the exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities in Ivanti Connect Secure VPN appliances in January 2024.

Around the time that the zero-day Ivanti vulnerabilities were disclosed, Darktrace detected an internal server on one customer network deviating from its expected pattern of activity. The device was observed making regular connections to endpoints associated with Pulse Secure Cloud Licensing, indicating it was an Ivanti server. It was observed connecting to a string of anomalous hostnames, including ‘cmjk3d071amc01fu9e10ae5rt9jaatj6b.oast[.]live’ and ‘cmjft14b13vpn5vf9i90xdu6akt5k3pnx.oast[.]pro’, via HTTP using the user agent ‘curl/7.19.7 (i686-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.63.0 OpenSSL/1.0.2n zlib/1.2.7’.

Darktrace further identified that the URI requested during these connections was ‘/’ and the top-level domains (TLDs) of the endpoints in question were known Out-of-band Application Security Testing (OAST) server provider domains, namely ‘oast[.]live’ and ‘oast[.]pro’. OAST is a testing method that is used to verify the security posture of an application by testing it for vulnerabilities from outside of the network [7]. This activity triggered the DETECT model ‘Compromise / Possible Tunnelling to Bin Services’, which breaches when a device is observed sending DNS requests for, or connecting to, ‘request bin’ services. Malicious actors often abuse such services to tunnel data via DNS or HTTP requests. In this specific incident, only two connections were observed, and the total volume of data transferred was relatively low (2,302 bytes transferred externally). It is likely that the connections to OAST servers represented malicious actors testing whether target devices were vulnerable to the Ivanti exploits.

The device proceeded to make several SSL connections to the IP address 103.13.28[.]40, using the destination port 53, which is typically reserved for DNS requests. Darktrace recognized that this activity was unusual as the offending device had never previously been observed using port 53 for SSL connections.

Model Breach Event Log displaying the ‘Application Protocol on Uncommon Port’ DETECT model breaching in response to the unusual use of port 53.
Figure 1: Model Breach Event Log displaying the ‘Application Protocol on Uncommon Port’ DETECT model breaching in response to the unusual use of port 53.

Figure 2: Model Breach Event Log displaying details pertaining to the ‘Application Protocol on Uncommon Port’ DETECT model breach, including the 100% rarity of the port usage.
Figure 2: Model Breach Event Log displaying details pertaining to the ‘Application Protocol on Uncommon Port’ DETECT model breach, including the 100% rarity of the port usage.

Further investigation into the suspicious IP address revealed that it had been flagged as malicious by multiple open-source intelligence (OSINT) vendors [8]. In addition, OSINT sources also identified that the JARM fingerprint of the service running on this IP and port (00000000000000000043d43d00043de2a97eabb398317329f027c66e4c1b01) was linked to the Sliver C2 framework and the mTLS protocol it is known to use [4] [5].

An Additional Example of Darktrace’s Detection of Sliver C2

However, it was not just during the January 2024 exploitation of Ivanti services that Darktrace observed cases of Sliver C2 usages across its customer base.  In March 2023, for example, Darktrace detected devices on multiple customer accounts making beaconing connections to malicious endpoints linked to Sliver C2 infrastructure, including 18.234.7[.]23 [10] [11] [12] [13].

Darktrace identified that the observed connections to this endpoint contained the unusual URI ‘/NIS-[REDACTED]’ which contained 125 characters, including numbers, lower and upper case letters, and special characters like “_”, “/”, and “-“, as well as various other URIs which suggested attempted data exfiltration:

‘/upload/api.html?c=[REDACTED] &fp=[REDACTED]’

  • ‘/samples.html?mx=[REDACTED] &s=[REDACTED]’
  • ‘/actions/samples.html?l=[REDACTED] &tc=[REDACTED]’
  • ‘/api.html?gf=[REDACTED] &x=[REDACTED]’
  • ‘/samples.html?c=[REDACTED] &zo=[REDACTED]’

This anomalous external connectivity was carried out through multiple destination ports, including the key ports 443 and 8888.

Darktrace additionally observed devices on affected customer networks performing TLS beaconing to the IP address 44.202.135[.]229 with the JA3 hash 19e29534fd49dd27d09234e639c4057e. According to OSINT sources, this JA3 hash is associated with the Golang TLS cipher suites in which the Sliver framework is developed [14].

結論

Despite its relative novelty in the threat landscape and its lesser-known status compared to other C2 frameworks, Darktrace has demonstrated its ability effectively detect malicious use of Sliver C2 across numerous customer environments. This included instances where attackers exploited vulnerabilities in the Ivanti Connect Secure and Policy Secure services.

While human security teams may lack awareness of this framework, and traditional rules and signatured-based security tools might not be fully equipped and updated to detect Sliver C2 activity, Darktrace’s Self Learning AI understands its customer networks, users, and devices. As such, Darktrace is adept at identifying subtle deviations in device behavior that could indicate network compromise, including connections to new or unusual external locations, regardless of whether attackers use established or novel C2 frameworks, providing organizations with a sliver of hope in an ever-evolving threat landscape.

Credit to Natalia Sánchez Rocafort, Cyber Security Analyst, Paul Jennings, Principal Analyst Consultant

付録

DETECT Model Coverage

  • Compromise / Repeating Connections Over 4 Days
  • Anomalous Connection / Application Protocol on Uncommon Port
  • Anomalous Server Activity / Server Activity on New Non-Standard Port
  • Compromise / Sustained TCP Beaconing Activity To Rare Endpoint
  • Compromise / Quick and Regular Windows HTTP Beaconing
  • Compromise / High Volume of Connections with Beacon Score
  • Anomalous Connection / Multiple Failed Connections to Rare Endpoint
  • Compromise / Slow Beaconing Activity To External Rare
  • Compromise / HTTP Beaconing to Rare Destination
  • Compromise / Sustained SSL or HTTP Increase
  • Compromise / Large Number of Suspicious Failed Connections
  • Compromise / SSL or HTTP Beacon
  • Compromise / Possible Malware HTTP Comms
  • Compromise / Possible Tunnelling to Bin Services
  • Anomalous Connection / Low and Slow Exfiltration to IP
  • Device / New User Agent
  • Anomalous Connection / New User Agent to IP Without Hostname
  • Anomalous File / EXE from Rare External Location
  • Anomalous File / Numeric File Download
  • Anomalous Connection / Powershell to Rare External
  • Anomalous Server Activity / New Internet Facing System

侵害指標(IoC)一覧

18.234.7[.]23 - Destination IP - Likely C2 Server

103.13.28[.]40 - Destination IP - Likely C2 Server

44.202.135[.]229 - Destination IP - Likely C2 Server

参考文献

[1] https://bishopfox.com/tools/sliver

[2] https://vk9-sec.com/how-to-set-up-use-c2-sliver/

[3] https://www.scmagazine.com/brief/sliver-c2-framework-gaining-traction-among-threat-actors

[4] https://github[.]com/BishopFox/sliver

[5] https://www.cybereason.com/blog/sliver-c2-leveraged-by-many-threat-actors

[6] https://securityaffairs.com/158393/malware/ivanti-connect-secure-vpn-deliver-krustyloader.html

[7] https://www.xenonstack.com/insights/out-of-band-application-security-testing

[8] https://www.virustotal.com/gui/ip-address/103.13.28.40/detection

[9] https://threatfox.abuse.ch/browse.php?search=ioc%3A107.174.78.227

[10] https://threatfox.abuse.ch/ioc/1074576/

[11] https://threatfox.abuse.ch/ioc/1093887/

[12] https://threatfox.abuse.ch/ioc/846889/

[13] https://threatfox.abuse.ch/ioc/1093889/

[14] https://github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/issues/3330

続きを読む
著者について
Natalia Sánchez Rocafort
Cyber Security Analyst

Blog

Eメール

Looking Beyond Secure Email Gateways with the Latest Innovations to Darktrace/Email

Default blog imageDefault blog image
09
Apr 2024

Organizations Should Demand More from their Email Security

In response to a more intricate threat landscape, organizations should view email security as a critical component of their defense-in-depth strategy, rather than defending the inbox alone with a traditional Secure Email Gateway (SEG). Organizations need more than a traditional gateway – that doubles, instead of replaces, the capabilities provided by native security vendor – and require an equally granular degree of analysis across all messaging, including inbound, outbound, and lateral mail, plus Teams messages.  

Darktrace/Email is the industry’s most advanced cloud email security, powered by Self-Learning AI. It combines AI techniques to exceed the accuracy and efficiency of leading security solutions, and is the only security built to elevate, not duplicate, native email security.  

With its largest update ever, Darktrace/Email introduces the following innovations, finally allowing security teams to look beyond secure email gateways with autonomous AI:

  • AI-augmented data loss prevention to stop the entire spectrum of outbound mail threats
  • an easy way to deploy DMARC quickly with AI
  • major enhancements to streamline SOC workflows and increase the detection of sophisticated phishing links
  • expansion of Darktrace’s leading AI prevention to lateral mail, account compromise and Microsoft Teams

What’s New with Darktrace/Email  

Data Loss Prevention  

Block the entire spectrum of outbound mail threats with advanced data loss prevention that builds on tags in native email to stop unknown, accidental, and malicious data loss

Darktrace understands normal at individual user, group and organization level with a proven AI that detects abnormal user behavior and dynamic content changes. Using this understanding, Darktrace/Email actions outbound emails to stop unknown, accidental and malicious data loss.  

Traditional DLP solutions only take into account classified data, which relies on the manual input of labelling each data piece, or creating rules to catch pattern matches that try to stop data of certain types leaving the organization. But in today’s world of constantly changing data, regular expression and fingerprinting detection are no longer enough.

  • Human error – Because it understands normal for every user, Darktrace/Email can recognize cases of misdirected emails. Even if the data is correctly labelled or insensitive, Darktrace recognizes when the context in which it is being sent could be a case of data loss and warns the user.  
  • Unclassified data – Whereas traditional DLP solutions can only take action on classified data, Darktrace analyzes the range of data that is either pending labels or can’t be labeled with typical capabilities due to its understanding of the content and context of every email.  
  • Insider threat – If a malicious actor has compromised an account, data exfiltration may still be attempted on encrypted, intellectual property, or other forms of unlabelled data to avoid detection. Darktrace analyses user behaviour to catch cases of unusual data exfiltration from individual accounts.

And classification efforts already in place aren’t wasted – Darktrace/Email extends Microsoft Purview policies and sensitivity labels to avoid duplicate workflows for the security team, combining the best of both approaches to ensure organizations maintain control and visibility over their data.

End User and Security Workflows

Achieve more than 60% improvement in the quality of end-user phishing reports and detection of sophisticated malicious weblinks1

Darktrace/Email improves end-user reporting from the ground up to save security team resource. Employees will always be on the front line of email security – while other solutions assume that end-user reporting is automatically of poor quality, Darktrace prioritizes improving users’ security awareness to increase the quality of end-user reporting from day one.  

Users are empowered to assess and report suspicious activity with contextual banners and Cyber AI Analyst generated narratives for potentially suspicious emails, resulting in 60% fewer benign emails reported.  

Out of the higher-quality emails that end up being reported, the next step is to reduce the amount of emails that reach the SOC. Darktrace/Email’s Mailbox Security Assistant automates their triage with secondary analysis combining additional behavioral signals – using x20 more metrics than previously – with advanced link analysis to detect 70% more sophisticated malicious phishing links.2 This directly alleviates the burden of manual triage for security analysts.

For the emails that are received by the SOC, Darktrace/Email uses automation to reduce time spent investigating per incident. With live inbox view, security teams gain access to a centralized platform that combines intuitive search capabilities, Cyber AI Analyst reports, and mobile application access. Analysts can take remediation actions from within Darktrace/Email, eliminating console hopping and accelerating incident response.

Darktrace takes a user-focused and business-centric approach to email security, in contrast to the attack-centric rules and signatures approach of secure email gateways

Microsoft Teams

Detect threats within your Teams environment such as account compromise, phishing, malware and data loss

Around 83% of Fortune 500 companies rely on Microsoft Office products and services, particularly Teams and SharePoint.3

Darktrace now leverages the same behavioral AI techniques for Microsoft customers across 365 and Teams, allowing organizations to detect threats and signals of account compromise within their Teams environment including social engineering, malware and data loss.  

The primary use case for Microsoft Teams protection is as a potential entry vector. While messaging has traditionally been internal only, as organizations open up it is becoming an entry vector which needs to be treated with the same level of caution as email. That’s why we’re bringing our proven AI approach to Microsoft Teams, that understands the user behind the message.  

Anomalous messaging behavior is also a highly relevant indicator of whether a user has been compromised. Unlike other solutions that analyze Microsoft Teams content which focus on payloads, Darktrace goes beyond basic link and sandbox analysis and looks at actual user behavior from both a content and context perspective. This linguistic understanding isn’t bound by the requirement to match a signature to a malicious payload, rather it looks at the context in which the message has been delivered. From this analysis, Darktrace can spot the early symptoms of account compromise such as early-stage social engineering before a payload is delivered.

Lateral Mail Analysis

Detect and respond to internal mailflow with multi-layered AI to prevent account takeover, lateral phishing and data leaks

The industry’s most robust account takeover protection now prevents lateral mail account compromise. Darktrace has always looked at internal mail to inform inbound and outbound decisions, but will now elevate suspicious lateral mail behaviour using the same AI techniques for inbound, outbound and Teams analysis.

Darktrace integrates signals from across the entire mailflow and communication patterns to determine symptoms of account compromise, now including lateral mailflow

Unlike other solutions which only analyze payloads, Darktrace analyzes a whole range of signals to catch lateral movement before a payload is delivered. Contributing yet another layer to the AI behavioral profile for each user, security teams can now use signals from lateral mail to spot the early symptoms of account takeover and take autonomous actions to prevent further compromise.

DMARC

Gain in-depth visibility and control of 3rd parties using your domain with an industry-first AI-assisted DMARC

Darktrace has created the easiest path to brand protection and compliance with the new Darktrace/DMARC. This new capability continuously stops spoofing and phishing from the enterprise domain, while automatically enhancing email security and reducing the attack surface.

Darktrace/DMARC helps to upskill businesses by providing step by step guidance and automated record suggestions provide a clear, efficient road to enforcement. It allows organizations to quickly achieve compliance with requirements from Google, Yahoo, and others, to ensure that their emails are reaching mailboxes.  

Meanwhile, Darktrace/DMARC helps to reduce the overall attack surface by providing visibility over shadow-IT and third-party vendors sending on behalf of an organization’s brand, while informing recipients when emails from their domains are sent from un-authenticated DMARC source.

Darktrace/DMARC integrates with the wider Darktrace product platform, sharing insights to help further secure your business across Email Attack Path and Attack Surface management.

結論

To learn more about the new innovations to Darktrace/Email download the solution brief here.

All of the new updates to Darktrace/Email sit within the new Darktrace ActiveAI Security Platform, creating a feedback loop between email security and the rest of the digital estate for better protection. Click to read more about the Darktrace ActiveAI Security Platform or to hear about the latest innovations to Darktrace/OT, the most comprehensive prevention, detection, and response solution purpose built for critical infrastructures.  

Learn about the intersection of cyber and AI by downloading the State of AI Cyber Security 2024 report to discover global findings that may surprise you, insights from security leaders, and recommendations for addressing today’s top challenges that you may face, too.

参考文献

[1] Internal Darktrace Research

[2] Internal Darktrace Research

[3] Essential Microsoft Office Statistics in 2024

続きを読む
著者について
Carlos Gray
Product Manager
Our ai. Your data.

Elevate your cyber defenses with Darktrace AI

無償トライアルを開始
Darktrace AI protecting a business from cyber threats.